Sky to block pornography by default to protect children

Found on BBC News on Tuesday, 20 January 2015
Browse Censorship

In 2013 Prime Minister David Cameron put pressure on internet service provider [ISPs] to make online filtering mandatory, saying it was the best way to protect children.

"ORG's Blocked project (www.blocked.org.uk) has shown that filters block all kinds of websites, including some that provide useful advice to children and young people. Customers need to understand the implications of filters before deciding whether or not they want them."

Maybe parents should do their job and pay attention to what their kids are doing online, instead of annoying everybody else. Besides, the kids are smart enough to work around those filters anyway and so all this is just snake oil.

Twitter complies with Turkey's 'national security' blackout demand – BLOCKS newspaper's tweets

Found on The Register on Sunday, 18 January 2015
Browse Censorship

Turkey has once again browbeat Twitter into censoring some of the content posted on the micro-blogging site, after being threatened with an outright ban in the country.

According to the New York Times, officials had told news organisations to cease reporting on a military police raid on spooks' trucks that had been destined for Syria in January 2014.

Turkey argued that revealing details of the police raid, after documents of legal proceedings relating to the story were leaked online, could damage national security.

Or Twitter could have put up a site for visitors from Turkey telling them that they were forced to disable access because of censorship pressure from the government.

The MPAA has a new plan to stop copyright violations at the border

Found on The Verge on Tuesday, 06 January 2015
Browse Censorship

The MPAA has consistently pushed for the power to block infringing sites from the internet: first by pushing for new laws like SOPA in 2011, then through a series of novel legal tactics.

As with SOPA, the biggest concern is what content owners can do without ever going to court. As long as there's a credible case, the simple threat of legal action against ISPs may be all that's required to take something down.

Censorship does not work. Never did, never will. Simple as that.

Grand Theft Auto fans push for ban on the Bible

Found on CNet News on Sunday, 07 December 2014
Browse Censorship

Many people's definition of "liberal" seems to be "say and do whatever you like, as long as I don't find it repulsive." Just as many people's definition of "freedom" is, in fact, "free to think and do only those things of which I approve."

Posting their own petition in the same place as the anti-GTA V one -- Change.org -- these petitioners declare: "Withdraw The Holy Bible -- this sickening book encourages readers to commit sexual violence and kill women."

It's a game. Nothing more. People have tried to link games to murder in the past, and now they try to link it to violence without any facts supporting the claims. It's so ridiculous, or is getting a game banned really a success for gender equality?

The internet is less free than last year. Thanks a bunch, Snowden

Found on The Register on Saturday, 06 December 2014
Browse Censorship

According to the editors, governments have become more open about their efforts to control the internet by "rapidly adopting new laws that legitimize existing repression and effectively criminalize online dissent."

"The growing restrictions at the national level are changing the nature of the global internet, transforming it from a worldwide network into a fragmented mosaic, with both the rules and the accessible content varying from one country to another," it adds.

Sure, you could argue that Snowden should have remained silent so you could continue to live in your little bubble of an ideal world. Fact is that he has not, and now government are forced do be more open about the censorship and surveillance they want to enforce; and only to a certain level until citizens will get fed up with it and demand a change.

Grand Theft Auto 5: Kmart joins Target in pulling game from sale

Found on The Guardian on Friday, 05 December 2014
Browse Censorship

Kmart has become the second major retailer to pull controversial video game franchise Grand Theft Auto from its Australian stores.

Target said on Wednesday it would stop selling the game in response to customer complaints sparked by an online petition posted by three women identifying themselves as victims of violence in the sex industry.

“Games should not be treated any differently than books, music, television, or movies rated R18,” Knowles said. “Consumers, which include parents and caregivers, should be allowed to make informed decisions for themselves.”

So it has been pulled because of violence against women in the game. The violence against men in the game didn't seem to be a problem for anybody. So much for equality.

Brit smut slingers shafted by UK censors' stiff new stance

Found on The Registrer on Tuesday, 02 December 2014
Browse Censorship

For a start, the BBFC wants no activities that it classes as "life threatening." These include strangulation, fisting, and face-sitting, although it could be argued the latter would require a morbidly obese performer to be truly life-threatening.

Watersports, violent penetration with foreign objects, and abusive language are on the banned list, although the BBFC says that in the latter case it may not go hard on producers so long as the pornography is clearly roleplaying.

Good luck enforcing this censorship on the Internet. Maybe their London Police will just continue to threaten registrars to shut down even more domains they do not like.

Lee Rigby: internet firms providing safe haven for terrorists, says PM

Found on The Guardian on Tuesday, 25 November 2014
Browse Censorship

Internet companies are allowing their networks to be used to plot “murder and mayhem”, David Cameron has said in response to the official inquiry into the intelligence agencies’ actions before the killing of Lee Rigby.

He demanded that internet companies live up to their social responsibilities to report potential terror threats and said there was no reason for such firms to be willing to cooperate with state agencies over child abuse but not over combatting terrorism.

There is a tiny little difference: child abuse is pretty obviously a crime, but terrorism might be anything the government does not like, although it is perfectly legal in other countries. Views might be radical, but basically "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter". You don't stop terrorists with censorship, but with education, facts and arguments.

UK ISPs to introduce jihadi and terror content reporting button

Found on The Guardian on Friday, 14 November 2014
Browse Censorship

They have also agreed to ensure that terrorist and extremist material is captured by their filters to prevent children and young people coming across radicalising material.

Speaking to an audience that included Australian prime minister Tony Abbott, Cameron said that he was pushing UK companies to do more “including strengthening filters, improving reporting mechanisms and being more proactive” in taking down harmful material.

A Downing Street spokeswoman said “we will keep pressing internet companies to be more proactive given the scale of the threats and the persistent propaganda from the terrorist groups”.

Everything goes like it was predicted right from the start. More and more censorship happens in the name of "protecting the children". Of course it is so easy to blame the big bad Internet, and not your own failures: increasing social problems, poverty, lack of education. You are more likely to fall for propaganda when you see no future in your current life. Give people a future and you won't have to fear propaganda.

Piracy Police Chief Calls For State Interference to Stop Internet Anarchy

Found on Torrent Freak on Monday, 29 September 2014
Browse Censorship

The unit uses a wide range of strategies, from writing to domain registrars and threatening them, to working with advertisers in order to cut off revenues from ‘pirate’ sites.

The Police chief believes that tighter rules may be needed to prevent people from breaking the law in the future. This could mean that not everyone is allowed to launch a website, but that a license would be required, for example.

He should move to China; clearly the "police" there has the same mindset as this one. The Internet is a free place, and anybody can set up a website, even without the permission of some pseudo police force who is funded by the entertainment industry. A police force who should listen to its own advice and stick to the rules, instead of threatening registrars without having any jurisdiction. They are nothing but the lap dogs of some private companies who funnel money into the unit.