Aussie ISP: We Won't Be Hollywood's Copyright Cops If Hollywood Won't Fix Its Own Business Model

Found on Techdirt on Monday, 17 December 2012
Browse Censorship

You may remember iiNet, the Australian ISP that Hollywood attacked (with support of US State Department officials) after they decided that it was too small to fight back, but big enough that people would notice. They guessed incorrectly, and iiNet not only fought back by taking a strong pro-consumer view, but won in convincing fashion.

Late last week it walked away from the discussions after Hollywood folks kept demanding a system similar to the US's in which ISPs would send along notices to people they accused of infringement.

Finally someone who has the balls to deal with the entertainment industry and its silly claims.

Internet porn: Automatic block rejected

Found on BBC News on Saturday, 15 December 2012
Browse Censorship

An automatic block would mean users would have to actively request that pornographic content was made available by their ISP.

Mrs Perry, the Conservative MP for Devizes in Wiltshire, led the campaign and handed over a petition to Downing Street containing more than 115,000 names.

She chaired the cross-party Independent Parliamentary Inquiry on Online Child Protection which concluded in April that government and ISPs needed to do more to keep children safe online.

Yeah, the children. As always. The primary argument when it comes to censorship. At least enough parents still want to be parents instead of letting some politicians and ISPs watch their children for them.

Hollywood Anti-Piracy Group Takes “Pirate” Domains To Avoid Prosecuting

Found on TorrentFreak on Thursday, 13 December 2012
Browse Censorship

With United States authorities leading the way, domain seizure has become quite the hot topic in recent months.

“The domains were all signed over voluntarily following contact from FACT as one strand of our ongoing strategy which gives alternatives to prosecution in certain cases,” a FACT spokesperson told TorrentFreak.

Sounds very much like extortion, which I doubt is a legal move.

UK ISPs Block Pirate Bay’s Artist Promotions

Found on TorrentFreak on Monday, 03 December 2012
Browse Censorship

Several UK Internet providers are blocking Pirate Bay’s perfectly legal promotion platform for independent artists. The Promo Bay website is currently being blocked by BT, Virgin Media, BE and possibly several other providers.

The website is entirely dedicated to promoting the work of independent musicians, filmmakers and other content creators.

That's not "fighting piracy", but fighting competition. The entertainment industry always cries wolf when something happens that dares to force them to change their business model, starting with the player pianos. Some might remember the drama when cassette decks got affordable, not to mention the Walkman which would obviously lead to endless copying and the destruction of the music industry. Arguments didn't get much better when music videos were shown on TV, not to mention the VCR lawsuits which took the drama to an entirely new level. When MP3 was developed, the industry again claimed that this would kill their business. Never ever anything happened; in fact, they always made lots of money as soon as they learned to accept the new technologies.

Telcos react coldly to renewed UK.gov smut-censoring push

Found on The Register on Monday, 19 November 2012
Browse Censorship

Telcos have once again reacted frigidly to suggestions that Prime Minister David Cameron will force ISPs to proactively offer web-blocking measures to subscribers signing up for their services.

The endgame is apparently for broadband providers to put filters in place for anyone signing up to the services who first say "Yes" when asked if they have kids. Those individuals would then reportedly be guided through a number of questions about restricting web access for their children.

The PM has been warning ISPs for some time to be more robust with their plans to provide better tools to help parents censor sexualised content online, to prevent the government from stepping in with its own regulation measures.

First you blame porn and use it to force censorship down the throat of people. Next thing on the list are political websites the government doesn't like and others, like filesharing.

Man arrested for posting image of burning poppy on Twitter

Found on The Telegraph on Monday, 12 November 2012
Browse Censorship

Kent Police said in a statement that the man, from Aylesham, was detained last night on suspicion of making malicious telecommunications and that he was in custody awaiting interview.

The force said in a statement: "A man is due to be interviewed by police this morning following reports that a picture of a burning poppy had been posted on a social media website.

Well what do you know, burning a poppy gets you arrested. This is seriously the most retarded reason to arrest someone. It's almost like there is nothing else to do, like, well, I don't know, hunting killers maybe. On the other hand, you have to start somewhere if you want citizens to get used to ridiculous accusations.

Big labels try for ISP blocking on 3 more 'pirate' sites

Found on The Register on Tuesday, 23 October 2012
Browse Censorship

The BPI, which represents major UK record companies, has asked the ISPs to stop people accessing Fenopy, Kickass Torrents and H33T.

“Like The Pirate Bay, these websites are profiting illegally from distributing music that isn’t theirs, without permission and without paying a penny to the musicians, writers and producers who created it," a BPI spokesperson said in an emailed statement. "It is plain wrong."

Just like everybody said before, more censorship will be tried by the industry now that they managed to get TPB blocked. It was so obvious from the beginning that according to them this will be the only option to save their failure of a business model. It will be interesting however what other arguments they will come up with when the Megabox service is launched which actually does pay artists and removes the middlemen, aka labels.

Jimmy Wales threatens to encrypt Wikipedia if UK passes snooping bill

Found on Ars Technica on Friday, 07 September 2012
Browse Censorship

"If we find that UK ISPs are mandated to keep track of every single webpage that you read at Wikipedia, I am almost certain we would immediately move to a default of encrypting all communication to the UK, so that the local ISP would only be able to see that you are speaking to Wikipedia, not what you are reading," Wales told members of parliament.

He said the data retention bill is "not the sort of thing I'd expect from a western democracy. It is the kind of thing I would expect from the Iranians or the Chinese."

Using HTTPS shouldn't be used as a thread; it should be made the default protocol.

Copyright Killbots Strike Again: Official DNC Livestream Taken Down By Just About Every Copyright Holder

Found on Techdirt on Wednesday, 05 September 2012
Browse Censorship

Here we go again. Less than 24 hours ago, content-protection bots killed a livestream of the Hugo Awards, thanks to the brief appearance of fully approved clips from an episode of Dr. Who.

This time, content protection via crawling bots have taken down another approved, perfectly legal stream. The victim this time? The Democratic National Convention's official stream, hosted at YouTube.

Nice going, huge list of content holders. Your boundless, maximalist enthusiasm is just another nail in the coffin containing what's left of copyright's reputation.

Maybe Google votes for the Republicans?

PayPal Bans BitTorrent Friendly VPN Provider

Found on TorrentFreak on Sunday, 24 June 2012
Browse Censorship

TorGuard, a company that offers VPN and proxy services, has been banned from using the payment processor because of its affiliation with “BitTorrent.” As a result, thousands of dollars belonging to the company have been frozen.

“It wasn’t until I called PayPal and spoke with a business account rep that they explained PayPal doesn’t allow promotion of ‘torrent trackers’,” Jason told TorrentFreak.

“We still accept all forms of credit card, Google checkout and couple of other secure wallet services. It’s ironic to use PayPal when buying a VPN/proxy anyway, they have a proven track record exploiting user’s financial info.”

Paypal is at it once again, screwing over those who use it to pay for a perfectly legal service. No court has ruled VPN networks illegal, but Paypal once again wants to police the flow of money instead of simply sticking to the laws, underlining once more that Paypal is anything but a bank as they often like to claim. Well, you can always try to file an official complaint at the CSSF.