'Censorship creep': Pirate Bay block will affect one-third of U.K.

Found on CNet News on Sunday, 17 June 2012
Browse Censorship

Designed by telecommunications giant British Telecom (BT), "Cleanfeed" was used to filter out child abuse imagery, and it did so with great success.

In 2007, Home Office minister Vernon Coaker ordered all U.K. ISPs to subscribe to Cleanfeed to prevent access to scenes of sexual abuse and "criminally obscene" content.

In April 2011, the High Court in London ruled BT must block access to file-sharing site Newzbin2 at ISP level -- using none other than the Cleanfeed system. It was widely seen as a "test case" building up to forcing bigger file-sharing sites off the British Web.

Almost exactly a year later, six of the U.K.'s largest broadband providers were told by the same High Court to impose a block on their customers from accessing magnet-link sharing site The Pirate Bay.

Which was the plan right from the start. By abusing the "think of the children" argument, those in favor of censorshop are trying to silence the critics; simply by implying (or even openly saying) that if you are against this proposal, you support child abuse. Once the few critics who still dared to speak up have been silenced and the proposal became a binding law it only takes a few years of silence around the project. Then you can begin to extend the now existing censorship infrastructure and abuse it.

Dear Jailbreaker, Apple Wants to Have a Word with You

Found on Thread Post on Sunday, 20 May 2012
Browse Censorship

After banning the word "jailbreak" from its app store and music library, Apple today reversed course and again permits the term - slang for hacking into a device to download unauthorized content -- to appear on iTunes and its App Store.

Apple maintains it forces sales of company-approved content through its proprietary stores to enhance security and reduce piracy. And while jailbreaking is legal, it violates the terms of use and voids the warranty on iDevices.

A slang for "downloading unauthorized content"? That's just completely false. Jailbreaking simply means getting back the control over the device you paid for, without any limitations the manufacturer forced upon you. It has absolutely nothing to do with unauthorized content. If I pay for a device, I want to be able to use it, no matter what the manufacturer thinks is right or wrong. Funny how Apple fans consider censorship and limitations as a feature. Imagine Microsoft would decide that you are only allowed to install software blessed by Microsoft: everybody would tear them a new one; but if Apple does it, it's for your security.

Court Forbids Linking to Pirate Bay Proxies

Found on TorrentFreak on Saturday, 12 May 2012
Browse Censorship

The Court has forbidden the Dutch Pirate Party from linking to, operating or listing websites that allow the public to circumvent a local Pirate Bay blockade. The political party is further ordered to shutdown its reverse proxy indefinitely and block Pirate Bay domains and IP-addresses from its generic proxy.

The Court specifically ruled that the Party’s reverse proxy has to remain offline. It was further ordered that Pirate Bay domains and IP-addresses have to be filtered from the Pirate Party’s generic proxy. In addition the Pirate Party can’t link to other websites that allow the public to bypass the blockade.

So much for freedom of speech. Now the Pirate Party cannot tell its visitors to use OpenDNS, Google's nameservers, the MAFIAAFire plugin, VPN or other proxy services to get around this censorship which was ordered by a judge who, for what it looks like, has financial connections to the entertainment industry.

TSA asks congressional panel to uninvite critic Bruce Schneier

Found on CNet News on Tuesday, 27 March 2012
Browse Censorship

"On Friday, at the request of the TSA, I was removed from the witness list," Schneier wrote on his blog. "The excuse was that I am involved in a lawsuit against the TSA, trying to get them to suspend their full-body scanner program. But it's pretty clear that the TSA is afraid of public testimony on the topic, and especially of being challenged in front of Congress. They want to control the story, and it's easier for them to do that if I'm not sitting next to them pointing out all the holes in their position. Unfortunately, the committee went along with them."

Those scanners, they help nothing. Not to mention the fondling and groping of passangers who refuse to go through them by "agents".

The Pirate Bay walks the plank on Windows Live Messenger?

Found on CNet News on Monday, 26 March 2012
Browse Censorship

When users try to send an instant message to a friend with a link from The Pirate Bay, Windows Live Messenger displays a warning, saying that the link is "blocked because it was reported as unsafe."

Microsoft's apparent decision to block The Pirate Bay might conjure up privacy fears among those who don't necessarily want the software giant limiting what they can and cannot do on the service.

According to TorrentFreak, however, The Pirate Bay appears to be the only major downloading site affected. Other prominent sites, according to the blog, can still be accessed via links in Windows Live Messenger.

With enough criticism, Microsoft will simply claim it was an error and remove the block again. This is why it would be nice to have client-to-client encryption in every chat client.

Smashwords Succumbs to Censorship

Found on The Digital Reader on Tuesday, 28 February 2012
Browse Censorship

The forces of Puritanism struck another blow yesterday. Mark Coker, the founder of Smashwords, sent out an email to all authors, publishers, and agents

Paypal, Smashwords’ payment processor, has issued an ultimatum. Someone at Paypal is grossed out by certain types of erotica sold via Smashwords, so those ebooks have to be pulled or Paypal will drop Smashwords as a customer. And the ebooks have to be pulled by Monday, or else.

So ultra conservative PayPal who only knows missionary after the lights are out has problems with erotica; and especially incest, rape and bestiality fiction. For all fairness I hope that PayPal will enforce this new rule with everybody. That would, amongst others, include Amazon and eBay. Most greek mythology would be gone. Even the bible couldn't be sold anymore. Or Twilight since those werewolves and vampires aren't human either. Wait, there is also Species with the aliens, and the list goes on.

Facebook IPO: Mark Zuckerberg Orders Banks to Shut Up

Found on International Business Times on Tuesday, 07 February 2012
Browse Censorship

In the weeks leading up to Facebook's massive $100 billion initial public offering, the company's founder Mark Zuckerberg reportedly told Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase and the other banks involved in the action to stop leaking information to the media.

Zuckerberg, who earns only $1 in salary from Facebook but retains a $28 billion stake in his social network, was reportedly unhappy that the banks leaked details about his company's Wall Street debut.

According to Zuck himself, privacy is over. Facebook constantly reduces the privacy of its users and would love if there was no privacy at all. However, privacy seems pretty important to him when it's about money; and this is also in quite a contrast to one of his statements: "By giving people the power to share, we're making the world more transparent". Transparency obviously is somethimg Zuck only wants for the users, not for Facebook.

Google to Censor Blogger Blogs on a ‘Per Country Basis’

Found on Wired on Wednesday, 01 February 2012
Browse Censorship

Google has quietly announced changes to its Blogger free-blogging platform that will enable the blocking of content only in countries where censorship is required.

“Migrating to localized domains will allow us to continue promoting free expression and responsible publishing while providing greater flexibility in complying with valid removal requests pursuant to local law,” Google wrote.

Censorship is promoting free expression? What am I reading here?

Web site blocking is oppressive and won't work

Found on The Inquirer on Friday, 02 December 2011
Browse Censorship

Whether it's copyright trolls wanting to censor filesharing web sites to extract high prices for their content or the UK Prime Minister wanting to shut down social networks during times of unrest, web site blocking is oppressive by its very nature. In addition, it won't be effective.

Worse still, attempting to block web sites gets you some pretty dodgy friends. At the same event, it was mentioned that the Government's plans to block social media during times of popular unrest had drawn applause from certain countries that you "wouldn't want to get into bed with".

So the government is going to block web sites? It can try, but it will be fighting a losing battle. Censorship of the internet is oppressively draconian and simply will not work, so even to attempt it is pointless.

Those in charge are simply afraid. Even though they are elected representatives of their people (well, in some cases), they are often neglecting the promises they made and prefer to stay in their current positions; because it pays off. A decade ago a politician was safe until the next election, except maybe for a few letters of angry voters. Now those voters can interact and speak with a loud public voice.

Judge orders Google, Facebook and others to delist counterfeit goods web sites

Found on The Inquirer on Wednesday, 30 November 2011
Browse Censorship

Judge Dawson of the Nevada US District Court ordered Google, Microsoft and Yahoo to delist the offending web sites from their search engines, and also told Facebook, Twitter and Google to remove the links from their social networks, according to the BBC.

The judge also ordered domain name company Godaddy to take control of the web site domains and block them from being accessed.

For now this works. Things will get more interesting with distributed search engines like YaCy and registrar-less domains. Without a central point, it's hard to censor.