Internet users banned from browsing privately for ‘security reasons’

Found on Tribune on Wednesday, 31 August 2011
Browse Censorship

In an effort to ramp up the monitoring of internet security, Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) has directed all ISPs to prevent internet users from using technology that would allow them to privately browse the internet.

A PTA spokesman said that the directive was intended only to stop militants from using secure internet connections to communicate with each other, but admitted that this could only be done by preventing all internet users in Pakistan from using VPNs.

The source said that ISPs are unable to block specific URLs on websites and have to block the whole domain.

It should be easy to make them reconsider that decision. Banks just need to drop any connection to Pakistan because without encrypted connections, security cannot be provided.

S.F. subway muzzles cell service during protest

Found on CNet News on Friday, 12 August 2011
Browse Censorship

The operators of the Bay Area Rapid Transit subway system temporarily shut down cell service last night in four downtown San Francisco stations to interfere with a protest over a shooting by a BART police officer, a spokesman for the system said today.

Activists had planned to protest the fatal shooting of Charles Blair Hill, who BART police said went after them with a knife before an officer shot him on July 3.

Those officers would have probably killed everybody in London by now if they were there. The excessive abuse of police force keeps on increasing and naturally it's only a matter of time until citizens consider the situation unbearable and protest.

Newzbin case opens up new music front

Found on MusicWeek on Tuesday, 02 August 2011
Browse Censorship

The music industry will waste no time in demanding ISPs immediately block illegal music websites following last week's landmark court decision requiring BT to prevent its customers accessing pirate website Newzbin2.

If ISPs do not block these sites voluntarily, the BPI will ratchet up the pressure and will seek court orders - citing 97A and the MPA case - requiring them to do so.

Of course they have to act. After all, this new weird thing called Internet will kill their business model. Just like MP3's did. Or the VCR. Or the photocopier. Or the radio. Or streaming video. Or automatic pianos.

Israel uses Facebook to stymie 'flytilla'

Found on CBC News on Saturday, 09 July 2011
Browse Censorship

Israel had tracked the activists on social media sites like Facebook, compiled a blacklist of about 300 names and asked airlines to keep those on the list off flights to Israel.

"Lufthansa called me last night and said I would not be allowed to board their plane because Israel denied me entry," Beatt said.

An EasyJet spokesman in Geneva, Adrian Fuhrer, said 40 people were prevented from boarding the plane at the request of Israeli authorities.

So let's think about this a little bit. Let's put aside the fact that it's a stupid idea to use your real name and information on Facebook, who has notorious privacy issues. Let's look at the fact that a nation uses Facebook information to create no-fly lists of terrorist suspects. With a little effort, anybody could create a fake profile, using someone else's name, and effectively ruin the chances to board a plane for that person.

Premier League joins group lobbying for web blocking

Found on Slightly Right of Centre on Tuesday, 21 June 2011
Browse Censorship

The group is attempting to influence public policy with a desperate-sounding and confused in places confidential submission to minister for the internets Ed Vaizey, who discussed the proposal at a meeting of stakeholders (including ISPs) last Wednesday.

The eight-page memo makes copious yet unsubstantiated reference to rights and freedoms, yet calls for a court-overseen blocking scheme "speedy enough to deal with urgent time sensitive material (such as live events)".

Does a "focus" on infringement actually include providing copyright-infringing content, or does this also include sites that link to copyrighted content? Techdirt recently reported archive.org and Vimeo were on Universal Music's list of "sites that support piracy".

It would be so nice to have an additional layer between the user and the ISPs, making it impossible for them to see what you are doing online. Basically something like Tor by default. Your ISP would only know that you are online, but not where you are or what you do.

China increases Internet control, takes down hundreds of websites

Found on The Next Web on Tuesday, 14 June 2011
Browse Censorship

Under the new controls, more than 700 pornographic and copyright infringing websites have been shut down. Individuals have also been banned from registering domain names ending in .cn, which is now now limited to registered businesses in China.

"Not just film and video sites are affected. All websites owned by individuals will gradually exit the arena. All paths leading to a future have been blocked."

"They are basically improving their censorship mechanisms," she said.

Anybody surprised? No? Thought so. I seriously hope that's it only a matter of months or perhaps one or two years until large revolts start in China.

China censors Web to curb Inner Mongolia protests

Found on Computerworld on Sunday, 29 May 2011
Browse Censorship

The censorship comes after protests erupted in the region when an ethnic Mongolian shepherd was run over by an ethnic Han truck driver, according to human rights groups. Ethnic Mongolians in the region have taken to the streets, prompting authorities to declare martial law in some of the cities.

The Southern Mongolian Human Rights Information Center said on its website that China's most popular instant messenger service QQ, which helped organize the mass protests, has been shutdown in the region.

China is a prime example of the consquences of too much control, and other countries still want to introduce more censorship. The chinese government censors in the name of national security while others want to use the same methods to stop your average kid from downloading a song. Honestly, I don't know who is worse.

U.S. Government Starts New Round of 'Pirate' Domain Seizures

Found on TorrentFreak on Sunday, 22 May 2011
Browse Censorship

Among the new targets are two sites that linked to copyrighted films hosted on third party streaming sites such as megavideo.com and veoh.com.

The authorities are also aware of the fact that the domain seizures themselves are not really an effective tool. As pointed out before, more than half of the piracy-related domains that were seized by Operation In Our Sites simply continued under a different name.

Morton replied to this critique by emphasizing that the seizures also act as "public education about pirating."

Educating the public about what? That those seizures are illegal, based on corporate bribery and not stopping anything?

Senate bill amounts to death penalty for Web sites

Found on CNet News on Thursday, 12 May 2011
Browse Censorship

The U.S. Department of Justice would receive the power to seek a court order against an allegedly infringing Web site, and then serve that order on search engines, certain Domain Name System providers, and Internet advertising firms--which would in turn be required to "expeditiously" make the target Web site invisible.

Any copyright holder also could file a lawsuit and seek to levy a less dramatic form of Internet punishment, blocking only "financial transactions" and "Internet advertising services" from doing business with the suspected infringer.

Watch the Internet moving out of the US. Not that this would be a bad thing. You can censor all that you want, but you cannot force companies to do business in your country.

Mozilla refuses US request to ban Firefox add-on

Found on The Register on Wednesday, 04 May 2011
Browse Censorship

The request came from officials at the Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the agency under the Department of Homeland Security that in February took the unprecedented step of seizing domain names accused of streaming live pay-per-view sporting events.

According to a blog post published on Thursday by Mozilla General Counsel Harvey Anderson, ICE officials alleged MafiaaFire circumvented their seizure order and asked Mozilla to remove it.

Good to see that the Mozilla Foundation does not give in to those censorship demands. "Operation in our Sites" (who comes up with those retarded project names?) is operating in a more than just grey area. Simply taking domains from their rightful owner is basically theft and thus illegal. It's also about time that the control over the com/net/org TLD's is taken away from the US.