Artist Ai Weiwei banned from using Lego to build Australian artwork

Found on The Guardian on Wednesday, 28 October 2015
Browse Censorship

In an Instagram post on Friday evening, the artist said Lego had refused the bulk order in September, quoting the company as saying it “cannot approve the use of Legos for political works”.

The Danish toymaker is expanding its presence in China as growth in the US – its biggest market – has slowed. In September, the company reported that Asia provided the highest regional growth rate.

At least other companies are less obvious when they bend over for a regime in favor for money.

Twitter shutters service that saved politicians’ deleted tweets

Found on VentureBeat on Monday, 24 August 2015
Browse Censorship

OSF confirmed yesterday that Twitter had killed the API Politwoops relied on to aggregate deleted tweets in all 30 countries it operated in, though this should come as little surprise — Twitter first scythed the API in the U.S. back in May, saying that preserving deleted Tweets violates the developer agreement.

It’s safe to say that Twitter is at least partly motivated here by a desire to keep politicians using the platform — if they fear a tweet they delete will automatically be saved and scrutinized, they will be less likely to use the platform.

Write a workaround and just pull the websites every few minutes. Or "crowdsource" it and let users submit screenshots.

Apple Removes All American Civil War Games From the App Store Because of the Confederate Flag

Found on Touch Arcade on Thursday, 25 June 2015
Browse Censorship

Many large US companies, like Walmart and Amazon, have already banned the sale of any Confederate flag merchandise as a reaction to the recent events. Now, it appears that Apple has decided to join them by pulling many Civil War wargames from the App Store.

It's looking like Apple has pulled everything from the App Store that features a Confederate flag, regardless of context. The reasoning Apple is sending developers is "...because it includes images of the confederate flag used in offensive and mean-spirited ways."

Sources close to the company say that it's working with the developers affected by the flag ban to get the issue resolved and get the games back on the App Store. However, the developers will have to either remove or replace the Confederate flag. If this is indeed what Apple is demanding from the developers, it raises all kind of questions about censorship and historical memory as it literally risks rewriting history.

Knee-jerk reactions are getting worse. You just don't censor history; the winners have done so already and there is no excuse for making it worse. Seems there is a limit for "freedom of speech" in the country that was built with this same freedom as a basis. Witness the Ministries of Truth at work.

eBay bans Confederate battle flag, other items bearing racist icon

Found on Ars technica on Tuesday, 23 June 2015
Browse Censorship

On Tuesday, eBay announced it would be immediately banning all Confederate flags and items bearing the flag image. The move comes in the wake of the recent South Carolina shooting that left nine people dead at the Emanuel AME Church, a historic black church in Charleston.

On Tuesday, the governor of Virginia announced that it would begin the process of removing the optional Confederate battle flag from specialized license plates. And one day earlier, South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley called for it to be removed from the state capitol.

Let's ban the flag; guns are not the problem. That's such a knee-jerk reaction. It would be interesting to see what they do if the US flag is used in the next shooting. They probably won't be consequent though, since pressure cookers are still sold.

Huge Loss For Free Speech In Europe: Human Rights Court Says Sites Liable For User Comments

Found on Techdirt on Tuesday, 16 June 2015
Browse Censorship

The court had found that even if a website took down comments after people complained, it could still be held liable because it should have anticipated bad comments in the first place.

The Court then notes that freedom of expression is "interfered with" by this ruling, but it doesn't seem to care -- saying that it is deemed "necessary in a democratic society."

For a Europe that is supposedly trying to build up a bigger internet industry, this ruling is a complete disaster, considering just how much internet innovation is based on enabling and allowing free expression.

This is one of the most idiotic rulings out there, but a similar system already exists. In China. Everybody in the western world complains about the strict chinese censorship (except for a few judges obviously), yet this decision will have pretty much the same effect. A democratic society should be able to deal with "bad" comments in a civilized way and tolerate different opinions. Totalitarian regimes don't.

France Wants Google to Apply ‘Right to Be Forgotten’ Ruling Worldwide or Face Penalties

Found on New York Times on Sunday, 14 June 2015
Browse Censorship

France’s privacy watchdog on Friday called on Google to apply a European data protection ruling to its global domains or face financial penalties.

French authorities are now increasing the pressure on the American company, saying that Google must apply the ruling across all of its domains in the next 15 days or face penalties including a one-off fine of up to 300,000 euros, or almost $340,000.

Just imagine the results if China or Russia would ask for the same.

Russia threatens to ban Google, Twitter and Facebook over extremist content

Found on The Guardian on Friday, 22 May 2015
Browse Censorship

The agency’s deputy director, Maksim Ksenzov, had issued a warning to the three companies on 6 May, telling them they were in violation of the bloggers law because they had not provided requested data on the number of daily visitors to several users’ pages, as well as information allowing the authorities to identify the owners of accounts with more than 3,000 daily visitors.

Since the start of President Vladimir Putin’s third term in 2012, the government has launched a crackdown on the internet in Russia, passing laws that give state supervisory bodies wide-ranging powers to to regulate and block websites.

Several news sites critical of the Kremlin have been blocked in Russia, including Grani.ru, EJ.ru and Kasparov.ru, which was founded by self-exiled chess grandmaster and activist Garry Kasparov.

Soo either Google, Twitter and Facebook give in and reveal the identities of critics, most likely dooming them to jailtime, or they stand up for free speech and deal with a block which would only be temporary anyway.

China Takes Its Already Strict Internet Regulations One Step Further

Found on The Epoch Times on Monday, 04 May 2015
Browse Censorship

Nine new conditions were included, such as not controlling illegal online information in a timely manner, failure to implement monitoring of online comments, or reporting, reproduction, or deletion of news information to improperly gain traffic.

“It [the regulation] transfers the pressure to these networks, and make the networks into de facto law enforcement organizations. They will block online speech in accordance with instructions from the communist central authorities. Website managers will become the regime’s accomplices.”

At least China does not try to hide it while other nations do their censoring less openly. In the end however, the information can never be withheld from the public forever and will sooner or later become available.

Worse than TPP? Defence pilloried

Found on Civil Liberties Australia on Wednesday, 25 March 2015
Browse Censorship

The Defence Trade Controls Amendment Bill 2015, expected to become law within weeks, regulates high-tech research and development in Australia…and may drive the nation’s best researchers and academics overseas for good.

If a university academic shares an “inappropriate” email with a fellow academic overseas on dual-use research, the Australian faces a $400,000 fine, 10 years in jail and forfeiture of work. Meanwhile, in reverse, the overseas academic could communicate exactly the same information to an Australian researcher without fault or punishment.

Like with the TPP trade agreement, the new law stems from US hegemony.

Down under isn't the nice place it used to be. Clueless politicians can ruin everything.

UK ISPs block Pirate Bay proxy sites

Found on BBC News on Wednesday, 11 March 2015
Browse Censorship

"Under existing BPI blocking orders relating to 63 illegal websites, ISPs are required to block the illegal sites themselves, and proxies and proxy aggregators whose sole or predominant purpose is to give access to the illegal sites," according to the BPI.

"To block a site that simply links to another site just shows the level of censorship we are allowing ISPs to get away with," he said.

Like this is going to help. If it's DNS based censorship, users just need to switch to uncensored DNS servers instead.