We've found another problem with IPv6: It's sparked a punch-up between top networks

Found on The Register on Wednesday, 29 August 2018
Browse Internet

In a report this month by Qrator Labs, researchers dug into what they are calling national internet reliability: the ability of a country's internet to handle a loss of connectivity from one or more ISPs.

The report notes that in 86 per cent of countries, IPv4 connectivity is significantly more reliable than with IPv6. IPv6 is, of course, supposed to be the internet's next-generation technology. There is nothing wrong with the protocol: it's triggering disputes between connectivity providers.

So just stick with IPv4 and learn to live with a limited number of addresses.

Internet chat system IRC turns thirty

Found on University of Oulu on Saturday, 25 August 2018
Browse Internet

IRC (Internet Relay Chat) was born at the Department of Information Processing Science of the University of Oulu 30 years ago. Jarkko Oikarinen developed the internet chat system back in 1988 in addition to his summer job. Today, people are still using IRC.

Jauhiainen likes to use IRC because it’s a versatile media of communication and can be customized. “IRC is not dependent on any device. You can use it on your phone, computer or even video game console, if you like. Of course also tradition has it’s effect,” he says.

Happy Birthday!

Facebook gives users trustworthiness score

Found on BBC News on Wednesday, 22 August 2018
Browse Internet

The tech firm says it has been developed to help handle reports of false news on its platform, but it has declined to reveal how the score is calculated or the limits of its use.

"This is yet another example of Facebook using people's data in ways they would not expect their data to be used, which further undermines people's trust in Facebook," said Ailidh Callander, a solicitor at Privacy International.

All is better as long as you do not trust Facebook and nullroute their domains.

Gmail now lets you send self-destructing 'confidential mode' emails from your phone

Found on ZD Net on Monday, 20 August 2018
Browse Internet

Google promotes the Gmail feature as a way to protect sensitive information by allowing users to set an expiration date for individual messages or revoke access to messages already sent.

The feature also prevents recipients from forwarding, copying, printing or downloading its content and allows users to require recipients to enter a one-time code sent via SMS to view the email.

Its main criticism is that Gmail isn't an end-to-end encrypted service, so Google could read your email.

Like that's going to work. As soon as emails are sent to a 2rd party, and/or downloaded with a real email client, it will stay there forever. Gmail is just trying to promote a "feature" nobody needs or wants.

Facebook flat-out 'lies' about how many people can see its ads – lawsuit

Found on The Register on Friday, 17 August 2018
Browse Internet

"Based on a combination of publicly available research and Plaintiffs' own analysis, among 18-34 years-olds in Chicago, for example, Facebook asserted its Potential Reach was approximately 4 times (400 per cent) higher than the number of real 18-34 year-olds with Facebook accounts in Chicago," the complaint states.

What's more, the court filing contends that former Facebook employees, described as confidential witnesses, have acknowledged that Facebook is fine with inflated numbers.

A second former Facebook employee is said to have observed that "Facebook does not care about the accuracy of information related to the number of users so long as advertising revenue is not negatively affected."

Not much of a surprise actually. The entire online advertising industry is pretty much full of scams and lies.

ICANN Loses Yet Again In Its Quixotic Quest To Obtain A Special Exemption From The EU's GDPR

Found on Techdirt on Thursday, 09 August 2018
Browse Internet

The Appellate Court pointed out that ICANN could hardly claim it would suffer "irreparable harm" if it were not granted an injunction forcing EPAG to gather the additional data. If necessary, ICANN could collect that information at a later date, without any serious consequences. ICANN's case was further undermined by the fact that gathering administrative and technical contacts in the past had always been on a voluntary basis, so not doing so could hardly cause great damage.

Maybe it's time for ICANN to comply with the EU law like everybody else, and for it to stop wasting money in its forlorn attempts to get EU courts to grant it a special exemption from the GDPR's rules.

Obviously there is no valid reason for collecting this data, so the courts have all ruled correctly so far. ICANN need to get over it and realize that the law applies to them too and nothing will change.

After Threats, Austin Founder Shut Down Browser Firm Authenticated Reality

Found on Xconomy on Thursday, 02 August 2018
Browse Internet

Users would have to sign up for an account—scanning their driver’s license and taking a photo—in order to download the browser, which would sit “on top” of the Internet, said Chris Ciabarra, Authenticated Reality’s co-founder, in an interview last year. “Everybody knows who everybody is,” he said.

In addition to the personal visits, Ciabarra said, the company received “hundreds” of harassing e-mails, all of which he said was reported to law enforcement. Ciabarra said the company returned nearly all of the $1 million it had raised to its investors. “I just realized we have to turn it off,” he said.

There is no way this will catch on. After all these problems with the theft of identities, this company expect users to hand over personal documents. Not only would this turn into a big problem once the authenticated browser gets into the wrong hands, but it also makes tracking users online even easier.

WhatsApp starts charging business users

Found on BBC News on Wednesday, 01 August 2018
Browse Internet

The move will allow its owner, Facebook, to make money from WhatsApp, which has lacked a revenue stream since dropping subscription fees.

The messages are set to cost between 0.5 cents to 9 cents (0.3p to 7p) a message depending on the country the user is based in. They can be automated or provided by human customer assistants.

Facebook paid $19bn to buy WhatsApp in 2014 and there has long been speculation about how Facebook intended to make money from it.

Or you could just use email. WhatsApp will be dead long before email anyway.

8 states take aim at 3D gun company, sue to get files off the Internet

Found on Ars Technica on Tuesday, 31 July 2018
Browse Internet

Eight states announced Monday that they plan to ask a federal judge in Seattle to immediately issue a temporary restraining order against Defense Distributed, a Texas-based group that has already begun making 3D-printer gun files available on its DEFCAD website after a recent legal settlement with the US State Department.

Within months of publication, Defense Distributed received a letter from the United States Department of State's Office of Defense Trade Controls Compliance stating that 10 files, including the designs of the Liberator, were in violation of the ITAR. This is despite the fact that these files had already been downloaded hundreds of thousands of times and continue to circulate online.

Someone should explain to the government how the Internet works; and what happens when files go online which are downloaded by so many people.

In encryption push, Chrome flags HTTP sites as "not secure"

Found on ZD Net on Tuesday, 24 July 2018
Browse Internet

Any site that doesn't load with green padlock or a "secure" message in the browser's address bar will be flagged -- and shamed -- as insecure.

That green padlock means any data sent from your computer or device to that website and vice versa is transmitted securely and can't be intercepted by an attacker.

Just overnight, several HTTP-only sites made the switch to HTTPS to escape being named and shamed by the browser.

HTTPS isn't a magic pill that suddenly makes the world a better place. In many cases, it's not really needed; but Google abuses it's share of the browser market. Website owners can protect their visitors more by not using Google or Facebook services which allow them to track you, no matter if you are on an encrypted connection or not. Not to forget that many will use Cloudflare as a HTTPS Proxy what means they give them their SSL private keys while at the same time the traffic between CF and the servers can continue to run over HTTP just fine. So much snakeoil.