Snapchat Breach: What's Next

Found on InformationWeek on Saturday, 04 January 2014
Browse Internet

Snapchat, a mobile photo-messaging app created for wiping out traces of the messages for privacy reasons, this week was hit with a major breach of its users' privacy that exposed names and phone numbers of some 4.6 million of its customers. The data dump came after security researchers published a proof-of-concept for a weakness associated with the "Find Friends" feature.

They had a lot of time to react to the reported security issue but decided to ignore it, and later downplay it, claiming it's pretty unrealistic. Now the it has happened and suddenly, there's an update? Too little too late.

Facebook Is ‘Dead and Buried’ to Teens, and That’s Just Fine for Facebook

Found on Wired on Friday, 27 December 2013
Browse Internet

Anthropologist Daniel Miller has been studying British teens, and he has a dire message for Facebook: The social network is “dead and buried” to Britain’s 16-to-18-year-olds because they’re “embarrassed even to be associated with it.”

Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg has been telling people for years that he wants to turn the service into a global utility, akin to the power grid or the water supply — something that feeds everything else you do.

Of course Facebook cannot admit that this will matter; investors would not like to hear it. MySpace wasn't much different, and it's far from being a utility. I don't even want to imagine a world where Zuck's FB is as important as water or power.

Amazon takes away access to purchased Christmas movie during Christmas

Found on Boing Boing on Tuesday, 17 December 2013
Browse Internet

Amazon has explained to me that Disney can pull their content at any time and 'at this time they've pulled that show for exclusivity on their own channel.' In other words, Amazon sold me a Christmas special my kids can't watch during the run up to Christmas.

Yes, Disney is stupid and evil for doing this. But when Amazon decided that it would offer studios the right to revoke access to purchased videos, they set the stage for this.

Exactly that's why people want DRM free content which they can download and use any way they want.

Facebook Patents Inferring Income of Users

Found on Slashdot on Saturday, 07 December 2013
Browse Internet

Among the patents granted to Facebook this week by the USPTO is one for Inferring Household Income for Users of a Social Networking System. 'For example,' Facebook explains, 'an assumption might be made about a user that reads CNN.com and nytimes.com every day that the user is in a higher income bracket.

Yet advertisers wonder why people start to hate that business more and more and install Adblock, Ghostery, block cookies and are interested in VPN services.

Is it ethical to block adverts online?

Found on BBC News on Thursday, 05 December 2013
Browse Internet

Adblock Plus, the most popular adblocking program on the market, has been downloaded 250 million times, and has around 60 million active users.

"Advertising has become even more aggressive," says Sean Blanchfield, chief executive of Pagefair, a firm that monitors how often advertising is blocked on websites.

The question is not if it's ethical to block ads, but why there is such a big demand for addons like Adblock Plus or Ghostery. Most users would not care to add them if advertising wasn't so annoying. Flashy animations, autoplaying videos, blinking graphics or hovering ads while you read a website, not to mention popups and profiling by aggressively tracking visitors: the advertising business has angered the users and often the ads need more bandwidth than the site itself. That's why people use those plugins.

Spam fighters call for "parking tickets" on unsafe servers

Found on PC Pro on Wednesday, 27 November 2013
Browse Internet

Anti-spam outfit, Spamhaus, has called on the UK government to fine those who are running internet infrastructure that could be exploited by criminals.

"Once they know it can be used for attacks and fraud, that should be an offence," Cox said. "You should be subject to something like a parking ticket... where the fine is greater than the cost of fixing it.

What's an unsafe server? Are admins in trouble as soon as a bug gets known? What about the time it takes until the OS vendor releases a bugfix? What if you don't know it can be abused? Why not fine Spamhaus for false positives?

YouTube hilariously impotent against ASCII comment pornographers

Found on Ars Technica on Tuesday, 26 November 2013
Browse Internet

A post at the YouTube Creators’ blog late Monday has acknowledged that YouTube commenters, never ones for productive discussion, have turned the site’s Google+ integration changeover to their advantage.

To compound the problem (just as we predicted at the time of the change rollout), Google greatly underestimated the ability of YouTube commenters to produce what qualifies as “engaged conversation” while managing to be also disgusting, offensive, NSFW, irrelevant, or all of the above. And that appears to be the heart of the issue.

People really look at Youtube comments?

Facebook Swears It’s Cool Among Teens — Really

Found on Wired on Monday, 25 November 2013
Browse Internet

The trouble is that the company’s attempts to quiet the story just draw more attention to it. The latest attempt came on Friday when Facebook chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg said that Facebook’s challenges with some teens have been “blown out of proportion” and that “teen usage of Facebook remains stable.”

Facebook’s popularity with teens is important because young adult buyers are especially coveted by advertisers, and there’s a worry among some investors that if younger teenagers stop using the service in high school, they’ll use it less frequently in college, too.

So it begins.

Lavabit founder: Feds ORDERED email providers to stay open

Found on The Register on Tuesday, 19 November 2013
Browse Internet

Lavabit's founder has claimed other secure webmail providers who threatened to shut themselves down in the wake of the NSA spying revelations had received court orders forcing them to stay up.

DoJ attorneys also dismissed Lavabit's argument that disclosing its encryption keys was incompatible with offering a secure email service. Marketing a business as a "secure" service to consumers provides no legal obstacle to court orders, US government lawyers state in the conclusion to their argument.

Maybe that's the reason why email clients don't offer a convenient and simple way for end to end encryption. Despite all the progress in the recent years, using PGP still requires the installation of 3rd party software and handling keys, something the majority of users don't want to do.

Snapchat Turns Down Facebook's $3B, as User Numbers Grow: Report

Found on eWEEK on Thursday, 14 November 2013
Browse Internet

Snapchat is a mobile app that that lets users, mostly teenagers—mostly girls—add captions to photos or videos and share them with friends, and then make the content disappear. Photos can only be sent in the moment—no uploading later. Young girls take pictures of themselves making silly faces, Carlos Danger types maybe send more lascivious content, and then poof! Gone. Unless the recipient grabs a screenshot.

$3B for a service which has no revenue and no real business plan besides "let's make it easy for teens to send each other nude pics". They are pretty stupid for turning down such an offer. Especially money from Zuck, who sees this as his chance to buy back the young generation which is running away from Facebook. That won't work though. Zuck should say hello to Myspace; they will share the same fate soon.