Antigua applies for permission to run 'pirate' website

Found on BBC News on Friday, 25 January 2013
Browse Internet

Antigua went to the WTO after the US moved to stop American citizens using gambling services, including web-based betting shops and casinos, run from the Caribbean country. Antigua claims that action deprived it of billions of dollars in revenue.

The WTO agreed with Antigua and dismissed a US appeal against its ruling. However, because the US took no action to lift the controls on cross-border gambling Antigua filed an application to recoup its lost cash by other means.

Sounds fair enough. The US may not like the decision the WTO made, but rules are rules, no?

Mega Launch Video Removed From YouTube By Music Rights Outfit

Found on Torrent Freak on Thursday, 24 January 2013
Browse Internet

After the video of the Mega launch party was taken down by music rights group GEMA overnight, Dotcom says the German outfit will be hearing from his lawyers.

“Incredible: The GEMA in Germany took down our #Mega launch press conference video from Youtube for copyright claims,” Dotcom announced this morning.

“I filed a counter-claim with Youtube and the video is back online. GEMA can expect mail from our legal team. Copyright madness,” Dotcom concludes.

Either someone at GEMA stepped into a big pile with his, or it's just a PR stunt made by Kimble.

'Red October' malware spies on governments worldwide

Found on CNet News on Monday, 14 January 2013
Browse Internet

On par with the memorable Flame malware, Kaspersky and a number of Cyber Emergency Response Teams (CERTs) discovered the malware -- known as Rocra or Red October -- which mostly targets institutions based in Eastern Europe, former USSR members and countries in Central Asia.

Red October does not simply focus on standard machines, but is also able to infect and steal data from mobile devices, hijacking information from external storage drives, accessing FTP servers and thieving information from email databases.

At times like this you begin to wonder how many other networks are in operation and still undetected.

Microsoft Messenger Service not going anywhere just yet

Found on Ars Technica on Friday, 11 January 2013
Browse Internet

What about all the people—and there are many of them—not using the regular, official, Messenger client for Windows?

Third-party clients such as Pidgin, Adium, Digsby, and Trillian use one or the other of these protocols to allow chat with Messenger users.

On March 15th, the Windows Messenger client will be blacklisted and unable to connect to the network, informing users that they must install the Skype client instead.

For instant messaging functionality, the Skype client is not the best thing going. It lacks any good equivalent to the tabbed chat windows that Messenger (and virtually every other instant messaging client) sports, and its support for media sharing is inferior to Messenger's.

I wonder who at Microsoft came up with that glorious idea; but I guess the "one program fits all" idea was part of the reasoning. MS has paid quite a few dollars for Skype and needed a way to move millions of users onto it, obviously because Skype also offers paid features. The problems Skype has (spying on users in China, incompatibilities and privacy issues) don't seem to interested Microsoft.

End Of An Era: Windows Live Messenger To Be Retired, Users Transitioned To Skype

Found on Tech Crunch on Wednesday, 09 January 2013
Browse Internet

Confirming earlier reports, Microsoft officially announced today it would be retiring its Windows Live Messenger instant messaging service in favor of Skype.

For those who grew up in the pre-Facebook, pre-smartphone era, the news is bittersweet. Some of our first social activity online took place using instant messaging programs like AIM, ICQ and Windows Live, once known as MSN Messenger.

At least MS should make it easy for 3rd party applications to make the move too. I have no use for Skype itself so if there's no other way I'll have to drop the MSN contacts and move together with them over to other IM systems which are not afraid of Facebook, Twitter & Co. Those antisocial networks might still exist in 10 years, but so does Myspace and Geocities.

Foursquare to show users' full names, share more data

Found on CNet News on Sunday, 30 December 2012
Browse Internet

Beginning January 28, 2013, users' "full names" will be displayed across the check-in service and venue owners will have increased access to users' check-in data, the company announced in an e-mail sent to users late last night.

Foursquare's careful explanation of the new policies comes in the wake of an Instagram user revolt over new privacy policies that appeared to grant the Facebook-owned service perpetual rights to sell users' photographs without notifying or compensating the photographer.

There you thought a company would learn from the mistakes others made; but no, they decide to step right into it too.

PayPal Bans BitTorrent Friendly Hosting Provider PRQ

Found on TorrentFreak on Wednesday, 26 December 2012
Browse Internet

After a fruitful partnership lasting three years, PayPal decided to ruin their relationship with the so-called “bullet-proof” hoster by freezing the company’s funds for up to 180 days. On PayPal’s advice PRQ opened a second account to get by while the dispute was being sorted out, but then without warning PayPal seized those funds too.

Not content with freezing two accounts, last week PayPal sent an email stating that they will be keeping all funds in PRQ’s primary account for up to 180 days to act as a reserve in case of any chargebacks. PRQ informs us that historically there have been almost none of those.

Paypal is the biggest joke ever. Either they want to do business with the PRQ, or they don't. In that case say so and return all funds to PRQ. If there is a chargeback they just need to tell the requester to deal with PRQ directly, simple as that. However, this would not allow Paypal to keep the money for half a year. They won't even tell the reason for the locking. Pretty convenient: no reason to make up some lies. It's even more idiotic that Paypal suggests to simply open another account: do people only violate their rules with the first account? I hope PRQ does not wait too long and complain directly to the CSSF, the Luxembourg regulator for Paypal Europe's banking business. Paypal can bully customers all they want, but it's still afraid to get in trouble with the CSSF.

Forget JavaScript, It’s Time for Browsers to Speed Up Images

Found on Webmonkey on Thursday, 20 December 2012
Browse Internet

The average webpage is now 1.2 megabytes and around 60 percent of that rather large payload comes from images. That’s a lot of data, whether you’re handling images responsively or just trying to speed up a desktop site.

And in fact there’s already a way to solve this problem with HTTP headers, namely the Accepts header, which tells the server which image formats the browser supports. Based on that information the server could then “re-encode, recompress, resize, strip unnecessary metadata and deliver the optimal format.”

So you spend your time to make your website look fine by putting quite a bit of work into the graphics used on it and then the server decides to recompress everything, reducing the size along with the quality; and when your images also get resized, your layout will get messed up.

German privacy regulator orders Facebook to end its real name policy

Found on IT World on Tuesday, 18 December 2012
Browse Internet

"This decree is binding," said Weichert, who added that it is unacceptable that a U.S. portal like Facebook keeps violating German data protection law. To ensure users' rights and comply with data protection law in general, the real name obligation must be immediately abandoned by Facebook, the ULD said.

"We believe the orders are without merit, a waste of German taxpayers' money and we will fight it vigorously," a Facebook spokeswoman said in an emailed statement. It is the role of individual services to determine their own policies about anonymity within the governing law, she added.

Sorry FB, I don't think it works this way. A company cannot decide what it wants to have when those demands are illegal. Using this reasoning, one could offer professional assassination services and argue that the laws stopping them from killing people do not apply because they are against their own policies. FB simply is against this demand because nicknames would mess up their data mining and selling of personal information.

Google+ head Vic Gundotra admits he was asked to stop using Twitter by ‘his boss’

Found on The Next Web on Sunday, 16 December 2012
Browse Internet

Vic Gundotra, formerly Senior Vice President of Social (and now, of Engineering) at Google, and head of the company’s social networking service Google+, hasn’t posted anything on Twitter since July 2011.

Sullivan gets Gundotra to say that Google co-founder and CEO Larry Page is who the senior Google executive effectively considers to be ‘his boss’, after which the former quips about now knowing who asked Gundotra not to tweet.

Larry's much of a control freak it seems. Way to deal with the head of your social network service.