Facebook, Twitter For Business, Is It Worth the Privacy Trade-Off?

Found on Slashdot on Friday, 14 December 2012
Browse Internet

I've been a staunch advocate of NOT joining Facebook or Twitter or the other social networks to protect my privacy and to not voluntarily give all my personal information away to corporate America, or even the Government.

Is the payoff worth the potential trade-off for generating potential customers for your business and guiding them to your primary website?

No. I haven't used FB and won't. Or any other "social network". Their primary focus is to make as much money out of your private data as possible and in return for that, they give the monkey a few cookies (literally). As long as email and open chat networks exist I won't touch FB et al; even if there's no other option left one day. At some point, a line has to be drawn.

Gmail goes down briefly for both consumers and enterprise users

Found on CNet News on Monday, 10 December 2012
Browse Internet

Twitter users took to their accounts to tell the world that the e-mail program wasn't connecting. It appeared that both the consumer version for "gmail.com" accounts wasn't working, as well as corporate e-mail systems that use Gmail as their e-mail platform.

Search Engine Journal's Danny Sullivan is reporting that Google Drive, the company's cloud-storage service, is causing its Chrome browser to crash.

I can't until someone praises Google for its amazing uptime when talking about other free email providers.

RPT-Russia, China alliance wants greater govt voice in Internet oversight

Found on Reuters on Sunday, 09 December 2012
Browse Internet

The proposal, co-signed by Russia, China, Saudi Arabia, Algeria, Sudan and the United Arab Emirates, added to fears in some Western countries of a stalemate midway through a 12-day conference in Dubai to rewrite a longstanding treaty on international communications.

This could allow governments to render websites within their borders inaccessible, even via proxy servers or other countries. It also could allow for multinational pacts in which countries could terminate access to websites at each others' request.

Surprise, surprise. Governments which have big problems with freedom of speech want the power to censor everything that does not fit into their political system.

Hollywood’s Total Piracy Awareness Program Set for January Launch

Found on Wired on Friday, 07 December 2012
Browse Internet

Beginning in a few weeks, the nation’s major internet service providers will roll out an initiative — backed by Obama and pushed by Hollywood and the record labels – to disrupt and possibly terminate internet access for online copyright scofflaws without the involvement of cops or courts.

“It doesn’t mean you give up on litigation,” said Chris Dodd, head of the Motion Picture Association of America, speaking at an industry gathering here Thursday. “It doesn’t mean you give up on legislation.”

So the entertainment industry can simply terminate Internet access for anybody; given their history of failures I'm sure there won't be any other mistakes, like, for example, dead grannies or people without a computer. Additionally, recent research papers show that piracy actually helps the entertainment industry, but of course they disagree with that which makes you wonder who is lying here. Of course it wouldn't be someone like Dodd, who ruled out lobbying but then happily joined the MPAA after quitting his senator job and later threatened other politicians who decided not to be a Hollywood sockpuppet.

Farewell Co.CC?

Found on Snat on Thursday, 15 November 2012
Browse Internet

Due to its free nature (and it’s $10 for as many as you want), Co.CC was abused and used for scams and spamming and was even de-listed by Google at one point although they did re-enable it. Getting back to the article on hand a few days ago Co.CC seems to have removed its DNS records which ultimately has stops its own site from working and every sub domain it provided.

Could have been disabled due to an attack and yet to come up, could have exchanged ownership and yet to come back online, could the owner no longer want to run the service or did the folks behind .cc wanted it gone.

Free is great and good, but you cannot survive with it. Especially not when scammers and spammers have nothing better to do than to abuse a fine service.

Google has customized results for Obama, but not Romney

Found on CNet News on Monday, 05 November 2012
Browse Internet

The Wall Street Journal reported yesterday that it commissioned a study on the way in which search results related to President Barack Obama and Mitt Romney are displayed on Google. The study found that when users search for "Obama" or "Romney," Google displays standard results. Other related searches, however, are treated differently.

Those who had already searched for "Obama" found that their results were customized to relate in some way to the president. Searches on those topics yielded no such customizations for Romney seekers.

The idea to guess what users want to search has always been a stupid one. It reminds one of Clippy.

PayPal security holes expose customer card data, personal details

Found on SC Magazine on Friday, 02 November 2012
Browse Internet

Dangerous website flaws have been discovered in PayPal that grant attackers access to customer credit card data, account balances and purchase histories.

One of the holes was publicly disclosed after a failed effort in July to responsibly disclose them under PayPal's bug bounty program.

“Communication is paramount. Researchers are often not doing it for the financial reward (you can make more on the black market selling these), but out of a sense of trying to better the landscape around them. Without a personal level of communication, companies often interpret well intended reports as malicious, and researchers lose the drive to participate when they do not see actionable results,” Smith said.

Just don't use Paypal. Less issues. With their history of bad business practises it's the best idea to stay away as far as possible.

France may tax Google for republishing headlines, President Hollande warns

Found on Computerworld UK on Tuesday, 30 October 2012
Browse Internet

France may introduce a law to make Google pay to republish news snippets if it doesn't strike a deal with French news publishers before the end of the year, the office of French President François Hollande said.

In August, the German cabinet backed a proposal to extend copyright protection to news article snippets republished by search engines. If the law comes into force, publishers could be allowed to charge Google and other search engines for republishing parts of their articles.

There's a rather simple and obvious solution to all this: if newspapers don't want Google to use snippets to link to them, Google can just stop linking to them. It's pretty much similar to any product: if you don't like the price, you don't buy it. Google has no legal requirement to include everybody in its search results. Actually they can already use the robots.txt to stop Google from using their content; but that's not what they want: they want Google to send over visitors and pay for that. It just doesn't work that way.

Outages hit Google App Engine, Dropbox, Tumblr, and more

Found on CNet News on Friday, 26 October 2012
Browse Internet

Connection woes hit popular services across the Internet. So far, though, it's unclear if they are related.

A mysterious rash of outages struck the Internet today, crippling major services for hours at a time. It isn't clear whether they're related.

First failures at Amazon take down Reddit, Imgur and more, now others are facing problems. Looks like "the cloud" is rather overrated when it comes to uptime promises.

Give social networks fake details, advises Whitehall web security official

Found on BBC News on Thursday, 25 October 2012
Browse Internet

Andy Smith, an internet security chief at the Cabinet Office, said people should only give accurate details to trusted sites such as government ones.

"When you put information on the internet do not use your real name, your real date of birth," he told a Parliament and the Internet Conference in Portcullis House, Westminster.

People do that already. Why would you give your private details to every random website, especially because data breaches and leaks keep happening again and again. Personal data gets sold and bought, and the ability to create a bigger profile on people makes the data more valuable. Random data however won't be worth anything; in fact it will decrease the value for advertisers.