Microsoft's Ebook Apocalypse Shows the Dark Side of DRM

Found on Wired on Sunday, 30 June 2019
Browse Various

Microsoft made the announcement in April that it would shutter the Microsoft Store’s books section for good.

And starting as soon as this week, it’s going to remove all purchased books from the libraries of those who bought them.

Microsoft will refund customers in full for what they paid, plus an extra $25 if they made annotations or mark-ups.

For certain types of readers, particularly lawyers and academics, markups and annotations can be worth far more than $25.

Just refuse to buy products infected with DRM malware.

Boeing's 737 Max Software Outsourced to $9-an-Hour Engineers

Found on Bloomberg on Saturday, 29 June 2019
Browse Various

The Max software -- plagued by issues that could keep the planes grounded months longer after U.S. regulators this week revealed a new flaw -- was developed at a time Boeing was laying off experienced engineers and pressing suppliers to cut costs.

Rabin, the former software engineer, recalled one manager saying at an all-hands meeting that Boeing didn’t need senior engineers because its products were mature.

Cutting costs is not a viable long term business plan. All this would be such a perfect and costly lesson to teach management that outsourcing is not a solution for everything if there would no be 346 reasons why it should have never happened in the first place.

Seven Considerations for Doing Secure Cloud Migration

Found on eWEEK on Friday, 28 June 2019
Browse Internet

Looking forward, executive management at technology-dependent industries—including manufacturing, high-tech and telecom—are increasingly driving toward become 100% cloud-enabled.

Successful cloud migration also requires successfully migrating security to the cloud, enabling organizations to deploy and manage a single, consistent security framework that spans the entire multi-cloud infrastructure.

Going 100% cloud based is like pointing two really big guns a both of your feet. Let them learn their lessons the hard way.

Gmail’s API lockdown will kill some third-party app access, starting July 15

Found on Ars Technica on Thursday, 27 June 2019
Browse Internet

Google is locking down API access to Gmail data (and later, Drive data) soon, and some of your favorite third-party apps might find themselves locked out of your Google account data. The new API policy was announced back in October, but this week Google started emailing individual users of these apps, telling them the apps will no longer work starting July 15.

One absolute doozy of a requirement kicks in if the app stores user data on a third-party server. Google will now require those apps to pass a third-party security audit, which the app developer must pay for. According to the company, the cost "may range from $15,000 to $75,000 (or more) depending on the size and complexity of the application."

After restricting API access for adblockers, Google locks itself down even more. A pity for those who trusted Google (or "the cloud") with their data in the first place.

Robots to take 20 mn jobs, worsening inequality: study

Found on France 24 on Wednesday, 26 June 2019
Browse Future

The forecast set to be released Wednesday highlights growing concerns that automation and robots, while offering economic benefits, are disproportionately killing low-skill jobs and aggravating social and economic stress.

The research comes amid intense debate on the rise of technologies such as self-driving cars and trucks, robotic food preparation and automated factory and warehouse operations and their impact on employment.

In the end the gap between people who can afford things and those who can no will widen until everything falls apart. Despite what economists and politicians promise: you cannot train every low-skill worker for a high-skill job.

How a ransomware attack cost one firm £45m

Found on BBC News on Tuesday, 25 June 2019
Browse Computer

Imagine the excitement when hackers gained a foothold in the computer system of Norsk Hydro, a global aluminium producer.

We don't know when it was, but it's likely that once inside they spent weeks exploring this group's IT systems, probing for more weaknesses.

When they eventually launched their ransomware attack, it was devastating - 22,000 computers were hit across 170 different sites in 40 different countries.

Imagine the hacker's anticipation as they waited to receive a reply to their ransom note. After all, every minute counts for a modern manufacturing powerhouse. They probably thought they could name their price.

But the reply never came. The hackers were never even asked how much money they wanted. Imagine the shock.

That's the only way how to handle such incidents. This, and a reliable backup plan that allows you to go months back if required. To avoid having your backups encrypted too, backup systems should have read-only access to source systems and pull in the data. There is no need to give source systems write access on a backup system.

Robocalls Swamp Hospitals As The Trump FCC Pretends To Fix The Problem

Found on Techdirt on Monday, 24 June 2019
Browse Various

Despite endless government initiatives and countless promises from the telecom sector, our national robocall hell continues. Robocalls from telemarketers continue to be the subject the FCC receives the most complaints about (200,000 complaints annually, making up 60% of all FCC complaints), and recent data from the Robocall Index indicates that the problem is only getting worse.

The problem will only get worse until somebody in government grows a spine and mandates that all carriers must implement anti-spoofing tech and provide completely free robocall-blocking tools to consumers by default, giving consumers full control over who can call them and when.

Spam works via more than one medium it seems. If it didn't, it would not exist.

Slack: Why is this loss-making tech firm worth $20bn?

Found on BBC News on Sunday, 23 June 2019
Browse Various

That values the Silicon Valley-based business at $20bn, not bad for a messaging app that was only publicly released in 2014 and has never turned a profit.

The biggest corporate customers pay at least $100,000 (£78,570) a year for the service. But Slack has never made a profit. Although revenue rose 80% to $400m in 2018, losses were $144m.

Slack may not be an email killer. It may, however, offer an answer to the stress of email overload.

It's not. It's just another tool for another niche; and there are competitors like Mattermost which you can self-host to keep the data of your company in your company. It has absolutely no potential at all to even remotely replace email, because you need an account with the repicient's channel. So instead of using a single emailaccount to contact others, you'd have to manage dozens, or even hundreds of accounts.

Gmail confidential mode is not secure or private

Found on ProtonMail on Saturday, 22 June 2019
Browse Internet

Even though Google launched confidential mode over a year ago, people are still confused about what it does. Is it actually secure or private? Is it encrypted? When you turn it on, does it prevent Google from reading your messages? The answer to these questions is ‘no.’

Without end-to-end encryption, Gmail’s confidential mode is little more than a marketing trick designed to pacify users concerned about privacy.

Google sure has no interest to make conversations really private; after all, they profit from having full access to all the data.

Facebook content moderators break NDAs to expose shocking working conditions

Found on CNBC on Friday, 21 June 2019
Browse Various

Workers reported a dirty office environment where they often find pubic hair and bodily waste around their desks.

One worker kept a trash can by her desk to throw up while she was sick since she had already used all her allotted bathroom breaks.

“There will inevitably be employee challenges or dissatisfaction that call our commitment to this work and our partners’ employees into question. When the circumstances warrant action on the part of management, we make sure it happens.”

FB does not really have interest in better working conditions. They already abuse all their users, so why not employees too?