Why the attack on Tor matters
Found on Arsd Technica on Thursday, 12 November 2015
The Tor Project made the allegations more explicit, posting a blog entry accusing CMU of accepting $1 million to conduct the attack. A spokesperson for CMU didn't exactly deny the allegations but demanded better evidence and stated that he wasn't aware of any payment.
Without oversight from the University research board, they exploited a vulnerability in the Tor protocol to conduct a traffic confirmation attack, which allowed them to identify Tor client IP addresses and hidden services. They ran this attack for five months and potentially de-anonymized thousands of users.
People might think that it'S okay because they were after some druggies, but this is a dangerous precedence of overstepping boundaries.