How Uber Used Secret Greyball Tool to Deceive Authorities Worldwide
Found on New York Times on Friday, 03 March 2017
Uber has for years engaged in a worldwide program to deceive the authorities in markets where its low-cost ride-hailing service was being resisted by law enforcement or, in some instances, had been outright banned.
Greyball and the broader VTOS program were described to The New York Times by four current and former Uber employees, who also provided documents.
Outside experts said they were uncertain about the legality of the program. Greyball could be considered a violation of the federal Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, or possibly intentional obstruction of justice, depending on local laws and jurisdictions, said Peter Henning, a law professor at Wayne State University, who also writes for The New York Times.
If they want to do it the hard way, drag them to court. Make a few examples by suing drivers for being in violation of public transport laws and disallow Uber from providing its service in the country. If they want to be a competition to taxi drivers that's fine, but they need to play by the same rules.